China – Australia relation

Turnbull’s Chinese is not bad. But …


Posted in China view, Chinese articles, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Zhang Weiwei talk on One Belt One Road Initiative.

Posted in China view, Chinese articles | Leave a comment

John Ross speeches

51 minutes long speech that covers lots of things, including the neocons, collapse of Soviet Union , rankings, understate achievements, US elections etc

Posted in China view, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The West’s errant conception of China

The Western mainstream media has a field day in the 19th Chinese Party congress that is currently being held in Beijing. All sorts of half-truths and innuendoes were apparently made to cast Chinese leadership under Xi Jinping in very bad light. For example, BBC reported that a million people were jailed under Xi Jinping in a purge. Actually, according to local media the anti-corruption drive merely punished 1 million errant party members and officials in the anti-corruption campaign over the years. There was no mention of jail sentencing. Thus majority would likely receive warnings, pay deduction, fines etc, rather than imprisonment. Hence, the once almighty Western media is slowly and surely losing its grips on news monopoly as most people can see how ridiculous and desperate they have become. Relying on the Western media for information will likely to reinforce the ‘frog in the well’ outlook.

Below is CGTN Liu Xin’s diatribe of Western media, which is rarely seen from a Chinese TV host. Nevertheless, it is high time now that more assertive Chinese voice is heard on the bad behavior of the purveyor of fake news, aka the Western mainstream media.

Getting To The Point: What’s wrong with this western story about China?

Source:Global Times Published: 2017/10/20 22:38:39

The West’s errant conception of China
China has entered a new era in building socialism with Chinese characteristics. The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China has mapped out plans for the new era. The Western media is taking great interest in what is happening in China and many mainstream media outlets in the US and Europe have given a lot of coverage of the event to cater to the public need. But some Western journalists do not show professionalism in their coverage and their reporting remains ideologically superficial and does not get the gist of China’s new era.

The Western media’s coverage of China in recent years generally recognizes the basic fact of China’s development and changes but their understanding misses the point of the true nature of China’s development. Their perception of China’s development path and future is absolute and lacks openness. They don’t want to see China’s success and such a subjective conception has penetrated the whole process in their understanding of China and led to their conclusion that China will not succeed.

We must admit that the Western media’s observation and analysis of China have erred. As a result, their perception of China is misleading, based on the following gauges.

First, they believe that the closer China’s development path and political goals get to the West’s political system and development model, the more China is on the right path. Once they believe China shows signs of diverging from the Western path and moving ahead faster, they consider it a wrong, dangerous direction.

Second, they believe that China’s development should focus on consolidating the West’s vested interests or helping the West safeguard their interests. China can have its own interests but China’s interests should not override those of the West and attempt to change the current world order. Otherwise, China’s development is deemed negative and challenges the world order.

Third, they believe that China’s development should not challenge the “universal values” upheld by the West. So-called universal values refer to the value system formed during the process of development of Western society, which actually parallels the continuous expansion of Western interests. Therefore, in reality and in international politics, “universal values” have to a large extent integrated with Western interests. The clashes of other value systems with “universal values” constitute an offense against Western interests. The further Western interests expand, the more frequently a clash occurs with different value systems. This becomes a major problem between China and the West.

Humanity’s knowledge and experience of self-governance is still deficient. It is impossible to establish an absolute criterion to gauge which development path is superior to the other. Instead it can only be tested by practice. In other words, the only criterion to assess China’s development path is whether it can contribute to the rapid progress of China and whether it can allow the general public to share the dividend of the country’s progress. International factors can also be considered. But such a gauge must focus on whether China’s development contributes to world peace. Factors such as whether the West appreciates or applauds China’s progress should not be given priority.

Generally speaking, public opinion in the West toward China’s rapid development is very complicated. This is understandable. The Western media’s conception of China represents their sentiment in the West which is far from having adapted to China’s rise. Their anxiety over China’s rise leads to their paranoia and unreasonable belief that “the West is all right and China is all wrong.” The influence of the Western press used to be overwhelming but the internal chaos and divide in the West weakens their position. The influence of the Western press is shrinking.

China in the new era is more and more confident. The breathless pace of development and ever-changing dynamics over the past decades reinforce China’s confidence. China can only succeed by following the path that is in line with its national condition. China cannot replicate others’ experience, particularly with its political system. This is the consensus of Chinese society. Therefore the incorrect coverage of China by the Western press can only mislead its own society and its disturbing influence on China is increasingly diluted.

Posted in China view | Leave a comment

Sikkim Stand-Off: China and India Collide in the Himalayas

KChew note: The Indians are playing with fire. I think China has the patience and wisdom to play this game with the Indian.  Trade and other sanctions must be imposed first, prior to military actions.

Sikkim Stand-Off: China and India Collide in the Himalayas
Indian hegemonism is on the march

by Justin Raimondo Posted on July 07, 2017
India’s ultra-nationalist government under Prime Minister Nahendra Modi is engaged in an aggressive face-off with China that could end in a large-scale military conflict. Although the strip of land, called Donglang, that is at the center of the dispute has long been acknowledged as Chinese territory under an 1890 agreement between China and Great Britain, the Indian authorities are trying to block a road-building project initiated by the Chinese in the region. In June, Indian troops crossed the border into Donglang and confronted the Chinese, and the stand-off continues. New Delhi claims that the road, if constructed, would give the Chinese the ability to cut off India from its northeastern provinces, where various insurgencies against the central government have been ongoing for years.

Legally, the Chinese are in the right: the 1890 agreement clearly gives the Chinese sovereignty in this area. Furthermore, previous Indian governments have pledged to uphold this agreement. But the ultra-nationalist Modi, who rose to power on the strength of a “Hindutva” movement that invokes a vision of Indian supremacy, is playing to his domestic constituency: Indian troops have been rushed to the border, and Modi – perhaps emboldened by his recent talks with President Donald Trump – shows no signs of backing down.

The 1890 treaty was primarily about the fate of Sikkim, an ancient Himalayan kingdom lodged between China, India, and Indian-dominated Bhutan, directly adjacent to Donglang: ruled by a hereditary monarch, Sikkim was ceded to the British while the Donglang region was given to China, then ruled by the Qing dynasty. Although close to India, Sikkim was an independent country until 1975, when India annexed it by force. After Indian troops moved in, an “election” was held in which over 97 percent of the 59 percent of the population eligible to vote chose union with India. Altogether, a very dicey situation: indeed, in 1978 then Indian Prime Minster Moraji Desair “apologized” for the annexation, while maintaining that it is “irreversible.”

The Indians are trying to muddy the dispute by hiding behind Bhutan’s claim to Donglang: but Bhutan is yet another case where Indian imperialism has nearly nullified an ancient state’s sovereignty. Until 2007, when Bhutan’s absolute monarchy was transformed into a parliamentary system, India exercised a de facto protectorate over the country, controlling its foreign affairs. When the Bhutanese sought to establish closer relations with China, the Indians retaliated during the 2013 elections by cutting off subsidized energy exports: the result was the defeat of then Prime Minister Jigme Thinley. India accounts for 75 percent of Bhutan’s imports and is its biggest trading partner.

India has used the same bullying tactics against Nepal, another independent Himalayan country on the long Sino-Indian border. In 2016, after Nepal adopted a new constitution that favored native Nepalese over Indian immigrants, India initiated an informal blockade, cutting off the mountainous country from vital supplies. China moved quickly into the breach, rushing in oil, food, and other necessities. Chinese investment in Nepal now surpasses that of India.

If we step back, and look at the larger picture, what is happening is another episode in the ongoing encirclement of China by the US and its allies in the region. During a recent meeting between Modi and Trump, the latter affirmed a closer military relationship with New Delhi, and the Washington Post reported that the State Department “approved the $365 million sale of a C-17 military transport aircraft to India. The administration is also set to offer a $2 billion sale of U.S.-made unarmed drones to help in surveillance of the Indian Ocean.”

The movement that propelled Modi to power in New Delhi is no ordinary nationalist movement: it is a militant and militaristic cult with a mass following. As I wrote way back in 2002, warning of the danger represented by this trend:

“The rise of Hindu fundamentalism as a political force in India catapulted the Bharatiya Janata Party to power and sought to expunge the Gandhian pacifism of the old militantly secular Congress Party tradition, replacing it with a new martial spirit. The idea of Hindutva, which energizes the Hindu activists, sees India not only as a Hindu state, but as a militantly revanchist force in the region, a nation determined to recapture its old empire. As I explained in a previous column devoted to this fascinating subject, the Hindutva movement has created a whole mythology based on the idea of ethnic Indians as the first and only pure Aryans: the swastika is an ancient Hindu symbol, and has been revived by what I call the Hindu-fascist forces in India. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the ideological center of Hindutva, has a provision in its constitution that its leader must be a blue-eyed Sarasvat Brahmin.

“I hesitate to use the term ‘neo-Nazi’ to describe a contemporary political movement, as it has become almost a ritualistic term of abuse. However, in this case, the label fits precisely.”

India, I would remind you, is a member of the nuclear club. We have to ask ourselves: would the Hindu fanatics now in charge in New Delhi hesitate to use nukes in a war with China? I’m frankly afraid to answer my own question.

As for the Chinese, they beat the Indians once before when ongoing border disputes escalated into violence – remember the Sino-Indian war of 1962? – and I have little doubt that they have the capacity to do so again. Indeed, they are evoking this memory to remind the Indians that they’re in for another beating if they don’t turn down the heat.

However, India didn’t have nukes until 1974, when it tested its first nuclear device. China tested its first nuclear weapons in 1964. This time around, in the event a large-scale Sino-Indian conflict breaks out, who plays the nuclear card first? With China’s military advantage, it is New Delhi that will have the incentive to put its nuclear ace on the table.

The world is revved up about North Korea’s nuclear testing, and the recent launching of an ICBM prototype, but that danger pales before what’s happening in the Himalayas.

The US must stop encouraging the Indians in their confrontation with China – especially if we’re expecting Beijing to intervene on our behalf with North Korea’s Kim Jong-un. That arms deal with New Delhi should be nullified until and unless the Indians withdraw their forces from Donglang. And, finally, the state of Sikkim, unlawfully annexed by India, must be restored to full independence: India has no more claim to Donglang than it does to Sikkim proper. Contrary to former Prime Minister Desai, the annexation is indeed reversible – because injustice cannot be allowed to stand on the strength of brazen coercion.

Posted in China view, Uncategorized | Leave a comment