The Haitian example

Haiti is a Caribbean country that is situated within US backyard. It suffered a catastrophic earthquake in 2010. One would have thought that with  aids from the US and other Western countries,  it is well on its way to recovery and the living standards of Haitian would have improved considerably. But this is not the case.

The Haitian situation clearly shows that much of these high profile Western aids have been ineffectual. The people of Haiti are still struggling even though there are ten of thousands foreign aid workers being involved. The article suggests that much of the aids money were hardly used for the benefits of the people who badly need them.

This article provides an interesting backdrop in the light of the Typhoon Haiyan disaster in the Phillpines.  The Western media have been bragging about the generosity of Western aids and ridicule  China’s aids  at every turn.  Shouldn’t aid or donation be voluntary, and not about having the  privilege to brag? In any case, the main question is not how much China can help, but how the Filipinos themselves can help their own countrymen. If I am a Filipino, I will be ashamed of the current situation where foreigners as the main saviours of my countrymen.

Anyway, if helping the victims are the first priority, then the Philippines government should just cancel the planned purchase of military jet fighters from South Korea. Nearly US$1 billion can be saved and then used to assist the victims. Much remained to be seen on how the situation unfolds. Who is going to rebuilt the infrastructure,  rebuilt houses, restart the local economy  and provide food for the millions displaced ? Are the West able to do that and for how long? How much of the money pledged can be effectively channelled and not fatten the wallets of people who work in the charity industry?

Basing on the recent Haitian disaster recovery experience, the prospect for recovery in the affected area in the Philippines doesn’t seem promising at all. My view is that the Philippines is shooting its own foot when it decides to become a pawn for US and Japan in containing China in Asia. It could have done better by balancing itself between China and the West, and thus in position to receive assistances from both sides.  China can certainty provide better longer term support and has better expertise in disaster recovery than what the West can do.

Haiti Continues to Struggle Three Years After the Earthquake

By: JT Larrimore and Brielle Sharkey, Research Associates at The Council on Hemispheric Affairs

January 18, 2013

Three years after the 2010 earthquake, Haiti continues its struggle to rebuild. An expanding cholera outbreak and food shortages following Hurricane Sandy in October 2012 have hampered earlier relief efforts.[1]  All the while, Haiti has become one of the most extreme cases of a state relying on foreign aid, receiving billions in foreign assistance throughout the years.[2] Despite the billions of dollars pledged and disbursed to rebuild a greater nation, Haiti has regressed back to pre earthquake conditions, as one of the poorest countries in the Americas.[3]  On the tragic anniversary of the earthquake, relief efforts and development programs must be held accountable for any shortcomings, while more transparency is required from the international community involved in the implementation of aid programs.

Aid Statistics

On the afternoon of January 12, 2010 a magnitude size 7.0 earthquake had struck outside of the Haitian capital of Port au Prince.  The earthquake was estimated to have killed over 200,000 people, displaced 3million victims and caused over $7 billion in damage.[4]  In response to the 2010 earthquake $13 billion has been pledged and $7.5 billion has been disbursed for relief efforts and development programs to Haiti, a country with a population of around 10 million.[5]  The amount of aid mobilized following the earthquake symbolized a tragic rebirth, meaning that the disaster had created an opportunity to improve living conditions.  However, three years later, 80 percent of the population still subsists below the poverty line with an unemployment rate of 40 percent. The International Food Policy Research Institute has stated that food insecurity in the country is now extremely alarming.[6]  What’s more, 357,785 Haitians are still relegated to living in the 496 tent camps throughout the country.[7]

These statistics raise questions surrounding the sorts of ambiguity about the consistency of allocation and the depth of distribution of financial assistance made by the international donor community. Reports on assistance have been conflicting; however, it appears that a majority of the aid was disbursed to scores of Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and private contractors.  In the case of Haiti, a majority of relief and development from the international donor community is disbursed to private organizations and independent contractors, which undermines the capability of the government and underscores the pervasiveness of foreign influence in Haiti. [8]

Foreign Influence

At first glance, hampered relief efforts are blamed on a lack of infrastructure, the sheer magnitude of the earthquake, and high levels of corruption.  According to Transparency International, Haiti stands as the11th most corrupt country in the world.[9]  However, while Haiti has proven to be a logistical nightmare, due to lack of infrastructure and corruption, a significant portion of the blame should be focused on the international donor community’s practice of bypassing the Haitian government. A majority of the aid from foreign governments, private individuals, and organizations, has been slowly leaked to organizations and contractors outside of Haiti. Only one percent of foreign aid has been given directly to the Haitian government largely because donor countries insisted that the government aid disbursement would be mismanaged due to systemic corruption and mismanagement.[10]

For years foreign powers have intervened in Haiti’s economic and political institutions; an action that has long been a major factor contributing to the institutional instability and dysfunctional management of the country.  Prior to its independence proclamation in 1804, Haiti was a French slave colony.  From 1915 to 1934 the United States occupied the country for corporate interests. During the Cold War Haiti had been seen as a strategic country. Foreign governments would oftern use force or their financial leverage as a method of persuasion to bring about a favored political agenda.[11] Furthermore, U.S. presidents associated aid with Washington’s political and economic agenda, where aid was suspended when Haiti did not abide with U.S. over interests.  As a direct result of this heavy foreign influence, Haiti has experienced countless brutal dictatorships and violent coup d’états.

Where did the money go? (Republic of NGOs)

Following the 2010 earthquake, 75 percent of all aid has been disbursed to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and private contractors located in the Washington metropolitan area. The remaining funds have been disbursed amongst international organizations and U.S. government agencies, such as the Department of Defense.  In many instance the government of Haiti has received less than 10 percent while local vendors and NGOs have received less than one percent of aid from such foreign donors.   Whereas a majority of the aid has been funded for temporary relief and pre-existing projects, “half of the donors invested in projects begun before 2010 continued those projects”.[12]

In addition to inadequately planned relief and development efforts, the level of inconsinstency in management of NGOs and private contractors over financial accounts has further hindered reconstruction efforts. The gold rush of aid following the earthquake has transformed Haiti into an attractive business opportunity for the private sector; in such instances, the Haitian government is unaware of how many NGOs operate within the country.  A recent review on relief aid distributed to Haiti by the New York Times reveals that “post-disasters idealism came to be undercut by the enormity of the task” where “operations cost were enormously high compared to the domestic cost”.[13]  Furthermore, the review gave accounts on development projects overseen by NGOs and private contractors that were over funded, financial mismanaged, and poorly executed.

In 2012 the Haitian Reconstruction Relief Watch (HRRW) requested information from the United States Agency of International Development (USAID) regarding aid disbursements to NGOs and private contractors.[14] The report furnished by USAID was the first report on aid transparency since the earthquake. The report revealed that the U.S. private contractors, Chemonics International, received $173.7 million in aid, when it had spent only $1.9 million to construct a building for the Haitian Parliament.  The Haitian government has remarked that building is nothing more than a “shell” which would cost the government more money while diverting precious resources and time away from more fundamental areas.[15]   Another example of questionable development projects are of the unfinished housing projects surrounding Port au Prince, where in Morne à Cabri, 3,000 housing units remain vacant. The housing development has been intended to provide permanent residents for victims of the earthquake. However, funding for the community remains clouded in mystery about its long-term future.[16]

It is hardly surprising that resentment among aid workers and foreign governments in Haiti remains high.  The lack of transparency from the international donor community has allowed the international private sector to operate without sufficient accountability, while ignoring the local government. Moreover, Paul Farmer founder of the U.S. NGO “Partner in Health” with over twenty years of experience has stated, “There’s graffiti all over the walls in Port au Prince right now saying, ‘Down with NGOs,’”…”I think people in the NGO sector need to read the writing on the wall.”[17] This symbolizes the need for the international donor community to reexamine aid efforts by listening to the Haitian people and government.

The international donor community commonly refers to Haiti as a “fragile state” believing Haiti is not entirely able to reach success unless it can overcome decades of political corruption and instability.[18]  Simultaneously a vast majority of the recipients of financial aid seldom publish progress reports while operating with little oversight.  Therefore, it is very hypocritical that the international donor community has been reluctant to fund the Haitian government over concerns of corruption when aid disbursements and lofty contracts are frequently given to NGOs and private contractors that operate with little to no accountability.


Finding solutions to develop and rebuild Haiti is not an easy task. Although there has been significant progress made, the successes are short-lived.  Conventional development methods cannot fit into the immensely difficult circumstances present in Haiti due to the lack of governmental institutions to assist in the rebuilding of the country’s dilapidated infrastructure.  However, if the Haitian government is not involved in relief efforts and development, despite initial success, inevitably those projects will inevitable fail. In order for lasting progress to be made in Haiti a number of reforms are required:

  1. The Haitian government must take primary responsibility in development and recovery efforts
  2.  Corruption within the government must be addressed and countered with realistic solutions
  3. Members of the international donor community along with authorities from the Haitian government must reinstate the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC)
  4. The IHRC must hold NGOs and private contractors fully accountable and while coordinating operations with the Haitian Government


Three years after the earthquake a majority of Haitians still live in poverty, relief aid has dried up and    reconstruction efforts have produced dismal results. Corruption, along with a lack of transparency and the various conflicting foreign agendas has been the main contributors to the failure of rebuilding Haiti. The people of Haiti should have the ability to choose their destiny, free from foreign governments infringing on their sovereignty. Special Representative Nigel Fisher of the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) stated, “Tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people are here delivering aid, but they are performing doing functions that should be achieved by the Haitians…You cannot complain about failures of the Haitian state if you don’t support its ability to grow stronger. For decades, we have not invested in that very much”.[19]

 JT Larrimore and Brielle Sharkey, Research Associates at The Council on Hemispheric Affairs


About kchew

an occasional culturalist
This entry was posted in China view, News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s