Jasmine tea transformation

Following article by David Gosset, essentially encapsulates my thoughts on why China is not receptive to the jasmine revolution that engulfs much of the Arab world.

Gosset is one of the few Western writers that have good understanding of China, though unfortunately he does not write for a major Western mass-media or belongs to an influential thinktanks organisation. People like him, I am afraid, will never be  admitted into the mainstream media institutions of the West. His writings are considered  heresy in the eyes of the  liberals, neo-cons, socialists and even conservatives  of all ilks in the West.  

 By David Gosset

All that is real is rational explained German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel in the years following the French revolution in the late 18th century, and he confidently added that whatever was rational was real. One can obviously discuss the exact role of reason in human affairs, but there is certainly some degree of rationality in historical events.

Like the “Color” revolutions and their roots in the post-Soviet Union space, the Jasmine revolutions are the products of a very specific socio-political environment. Irresponsible leaders, bad governance, a profound identity crisis, economic and political frustrations but also the failures of Western policies in the Middle East are some of the elements which explain the radical social movements changing the Arab world. In that sense, a Jasminerevolution cannot erupt and develop in the Chinese context.

In fact, Deng Xiaoping’s “reform and opening up” that began in the 1980s is a continuous socio-political spring with Chinese characteristics, and, to continue the floral metaphor, could be described as a Jasmine tea transformation. More precisely, this transformation is a managed process of modernization on China’s own terms and in relation with the Chinese intellectual tradition, and not about a great leap toward the unknown.

The Chinese controlled metamorphosis is not only benefiting one fifth of mankind but is also an engine of economic growth for the global village, a guarantee of geopolitical stability and a source of new ideas. A Jasmine revolution would be an interruption of an objectively positive Jasmine tea transformation and this is why it has fundamentally no raison d’etre in post-Mao Zedong China.

Even if the forces which are reshaping the Arab world and the dynamics which are transforming China could not be more different, some segments of Western society seem to believe that anti-government protests could seriously disrupt the stability of the People’s Republic.

On February 20, Jon Huntsman, the resigning United States ambassador in China and rumored Republican presidential candidate, marched on Beijing’s Wangfujing with a handful group of “Jasmine revolutionaries” – the American embassy declared in an unconvincing statement that Huntsman’s presence was simply a coincidence!

In the world’s most populous nation, one can certainly encounter activists who advocate radical changes, but it is mainstream China that will determine the country’s future. According to the Washington-based Pew Research Center, 87% of the Chinese people were satisfied with their country’s overall situation in 2010 – the satisfaction rate was 72% in 2005. It is frustration and despair which took some of the 360 million Arabs to the streets of Tunis, Cairo, Sanaa, Tripoli or Amman, but energy, optimism and a sense of cheerfulness characterize the Chinese collective mood.

External prestige impacts internal politics. While China is gaining more and more psychological “face” as a strategic actor, the Arab world has been regrettably losing status and reputation. Able to stage world events in global cities – the Beijing Summer Olympic Games or the Shanghai World Expo – China is a highly respected global player whose position is central on all major transnational issues.

For decades, the Arab world has been unable to find a solution to the Palestinian question, and it is Turkey not Egypt which is the reemerging and stabilizing force in a region once dominated by the Ottoman Empire. Two years ago in The Geopolitics of Emotion, the French analyst Dominique Moisi associated the Western societies, the Arab world and Asia’s Far East with, respectively, the sentiments of fear, humiliation and hope. Beijing’s undeniable reemergence has generated a sense of pride, and if, in the Arab streets a sentiment of humiliation prevails, China is filled with confidence.

“Merit may exist independently of dignity, but no dignity is without a certain merit,” observed French author Francois de la Rochefoucault in one of his maxims (422). Domestically, objective socio-economic achievements speak in favor of the Chinese regime. The world’s second-largest economy is actively building state-of-the-art infrastructures linking entire new cities where an euphoric consumption is often taking place. Some of the world’s largest companies have already realized that the “Chinese consumer” is the main business story of the coming decade.

If one can point at the remaining Chinese social problems, at the shortcomings of Beijing’s bureaucracy, at the risks of inflation or economic disparities, one has also to acknowledge that a system that took 400 million people – more than the entire population of the Arab world – out of poverty, and which put China in a position to become in the coming decades the largest economy in the world, has a solid legitimacy.

The Middle East crises can not be separated from failed leadership and dysfunctional governance. In the name of stability, power evolved into paralysis which, in some cases, degenerated into tyranny. Ben Ali ruled over Tunisia during 24 years, Hosni Mubarak governed Egypt for 30 years, Ali Abdullah Saleh has been the president of Yemen for 33 years and Muammar Gaddafi monopolized power in Libya for 42 years. In post-Maoist China, leaders enter the office temporarily in accordance with constitutional laws.

Since the establishment of the People’s Republic in 1949, Beijing has seen four generations of leaders, and in 2002 the transition from the third to the fourth generation took place between two living statesmen in an orderly process. Next year, the transition of power from President Hu Jintao to Xi Jinping – representing the fifth generation – at the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China is very likely to be smooth.

Wan Gang, China’s minister of science and technology, and Chen Zhu, the minister of health, are not even members of the Communist Party. To avoid complacency, the Western elites and public opinions should pay attention to the fact that the Chinese administration is able to select highly competent officials whose sense of responsibility is often remarkable. If corruption is also a Chinese issue, China is neither a corrupt nor a failed state.

Since Deng’s death in 1997, Beijing’s major orientations are decided by a collective leadership among which a consensus has emerged and which is supported by the vast majority of the Chinese citizens : the country needs reforms to perfect the rule of law, to create the conditions of a sustainable economic growth and to provide a better social justice, but not a revolution. In other words, China needs gradual change but no political disruptions or economic discontinuities.

Observers of the gigantic Chinese society should also remember that post-Maoist China can be better understood as a reaction against the anarchic and destructive moments of the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976). China wants stability and predictability and it will strongly oppose actions which could lead to chaotic uncertainties or vast and violent social movements.

Tourists not protesters ambulate on Tiananmen Square, and since the beginning of the year they can reflect upon a new presence on Beijing’s iconic open space: a massive statue of Confucius is now facing Mao’s portrait. 21st century Neo-Confucianism is not about revolutionary protests but ritualistic order, moderation and harmony. In its depths the Chinese world has no appetite for a revolution inspired by foreign references, China has embarked on a process of renaissance through the reinterpretation of its own tradition.

While Washington and Brussels will be occupied with the Middle East problems, China will continue to renew itself and, by doing so, will regain centrality in the world’s affairs. Chinese jasmine tea does not only exhale a delicate perfume but it is also a healthy drink; Beijing certainly does not need a “Jasmine Revolution” but the Arab world, and other parts of the developing world, might want to taste the Jasmine tea transformation.

David Gosset is director of the Euro-China Center for International and Business Relations at CEIBS, Shanghai & Beijing , and founder of the Euro-China Forum.

(Copyright 2011 David Gosset.)


About kchew

an occasional culturalist
This entry was posted in China view. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s